Apple and Samsung continue to dominate the smartphone market, offering feature-packed flagships. The Apple iPhone 16 Vs Samsung Galaxy S24 cater to different audiences, boasting advanced specifications and unique user experiences. This detailed comparison evaluates their design, display, battery life, charging, speakers, performance, cameras, and more.
Design
The iPhone 16 maintains Apple’s minimalist aesthetic with a durable ceramic shield front, glass back, and aluminium frame. It feels lightweight and sleek in hand at 7.8mm thickness and 170g weight. The device comes in classic Apple shades, including white, black, and a new pastel palette.
The Galaxy S24, on the other hand, uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and an aluminium frame, ensuring durability. It is slightly heavier at 167g and has a thickness of 7.6mm. The phone stands out with vibrant colours like Jade Green and Sapphire Blue, offering more customisation.
Both phones are IP68-rated, making them resistant to dust and water. While the iPhone 16 focuses on elegant simplicity, the Galaxy S24 leans toward ruggedness and variety.
Display
The iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24 both offer top-notch display quality, excelling in brightness and HDR standards. In our testing, the iPhone 16 has a slight advantage, boasting an additional 300 nits of brightness, making it a standout for vivid visuals.
However, the Galaxy S24 takes the lead with its superior 120Hz LTPO OLED display. This high refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and enhanced responsiveness, while the iPhone 16, surprisingly in 2024, sticks to a 60Hz refresh rate, which feels less competitive in comparison.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery efficiency is crucial for modern smartphones. Here’s a detailed comparison:
| Feature | iPhone 16 | Galaxy S24 |
| Battery Capacity | 3561mAh | 4000mAh |
| Wired Charging | 25W | 25W |
| Wireless Charging | 25W (MagSafe support) | 15W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (wired) | Yes (wireless) |
iPhone 16 boasts better software optimization, offering longer usage times despite a smaller battery. The Galaxy S24 leads in raw capacity, suitable for power users.
Speaker Performance
The iPhone 16 features stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support. Audio is crisp, and even at high volumes, distortion is minimal. It is excellent for music, movies, and calls.
The Galaxy S24 also includes stereo speakers, with a slight emphasis on bass. This makes it ideal for gaming and action-packed media. While both perform well, the iPhone 16 edges ahead in sound clarity.
Performance Comparison: iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24
| Aspect | iPhone 16 | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
| Processor | Apple A18 chip | Exynos 2400 with AMD GPU |
| Base RAM & Storage | 8GB RAM, 128GB (NVMe storage) | 8GB RAM, 128GB (UFS 3.1/4.0 storage) |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7,929 | 6,747 |
| 3DMark GPU Score | 3,997 | 4,183 |
Both devices excel in different areas. The iPhone 16 leads in CPU performance, while the Galaxy S24 shows stronger GPU capabilities. These results make both devices strong contenders for high-performance tasks.
Cameras
The Apple iPhone 16 Vs Samsung Galaxy S24 both feature powerful main cameras with 48MP sensors, but they differ in their secondary camera setups. The Galaxy S24 has a 3x telephoto lens, giving it an advantage in optical zoom compared to the iPhone 16, which does not have a dedicated telephoto lens. When it comes to ultrawide shots, both phones deliver high-resolution images, but the iPhone 16 has an edge due to its ultrawide camera’s autofocus capability, which allows it to capture sharper close-up shots compared to the Galaxy S24’s fixed-focus ultrawide.
Both devices perform equally well for selfie enthusiasts, each sporting a 12MP front camera with similar focal lengths. This makes them both strong contenders for capturing high-quality selfies and making video calls, offering users comparable performance in this area.
Price
| Variant | iPhone 16 | Galaxy S24 |
| 128 GB | 77,900 | 74,999 |
| 256 GB | 89,900 | 79,999 |
| 512 GB | 1,09,900 | 89,999 |
Verdict
The iPhone 16 stands out as the superior device overall, offering longer battery life, a brighter display (though lacking high-refresh-rate support), better sound quality from its speakers, and a more powerful system-on-chip (SoC). Additionally, the iPhone 16 delivers a superior camera experience, making it a more well-rounded choice for most users.
On the other hand, the Galaxy S24 holds some notable advantages, including its smoother display, faster charging speed, 3x optical zoom camera, and a more affordable price. If you prefer Android or have a specific need for these features, the Galaxy S24 might be the better option. However, if you are open to either platform and have the budget, the iPhone 16 is the clear winner.
| Feature | iPhone 16 | Galaxy S24 |
| Battery Life | Longer-lasting | Comparable, but slightly less efficient |
| Display Brightness | Brighter display for outdoor use | High-quality, but slightly dimmer |
| Audio Quality | Superior sound clarity | Good, but less immersive |
| Performance Power | Faster and more efficient | Strong performance |
| Camera Excellence | Exceptional quality in all scenarios | 3x optical zoom for detailed shots |
| Smoother Display | Smooth, but not the focus | Higher refresh rate for a seamless feel |
| Charging Speed | Standard charging | Faster charging capabilities |
| Affordability | Premium pricing | More budget-friendly |
For more information stay updated with Thetechguider.com